We've sacrificed customer service at the foot of profitability. And there's, you know, Harvard did a study back in the 80s,90s, several hundred thousand businesses in distribution and found that customer satisfaction was directly dependent on employee satisfaction. We've been driving everything in this industry, not just this industry in America, on headcount. I wish the heck we'd never created sales per employee metrics because everybody drives their business that way rather than what's the consequence of too high a sales per employee number? It's not, damn, that's good. We're making a lot of money. Damn, you're at risk to upsetting your customers and losing them. It's the same thing with employees, like you're saying, Alex. If I don't like this Charles Handy guy that started this London School of Economics, he's one of the books we use in our homework and classes. He wants to have a structure of a company be like a shamrock. You got a core of employees who are necessary to operate your business. You got a core of suppliers and subcontractors that. are necessary to bolster the skills that you don't have. Then you got consultants and specialists who help you make your business better all the time. In America, Peter Drucker is the counterpart. In America, what he used to say is, you got three things that make a company work, your market, your product, your distribution channel. Then he would say, your distribution channel is the one you pay the least attention to, and that's the one that makes you all the money. And it's true. So when we look at through that prism at the management of a company, we kind of get what we deserve. We're asking the managers to make money at almost any expense. So that case where it's a 70 or 80 job, it's a specialist job, it's a common error. We don't schedule according to skills that that guy's got a backlog that's the next four months. And, oh, we better train somebody else up so that we bring that backlog down. No, we don't do that. We put a rookie on. because he's got lost time because I don't have a job for him. Right. There's some fundamental flaws. It's a bigger issue than lazy management, although that's part of it. We don't teach managers how to operate with people. They don't have good interpersonal skills. How often do you, you know, we see screw-ups. I mean, it's almost part of our makeup. We really have to look for things that are good that people are doing. That's not how we're trained. I'll jump your bones. Damn it. What's the matter with you? Why'd you do that? Rather than George, that was just fantastic. Let's share that with everybody. Or who's the employee of the month. We do that in fast foods. We don't do that in dealers. What's the best mechanic? Lowest redo rate, highest on time rate, you know, simple things. It's not how much money they make. It's, it's, it's really wild. In our training, we'd have these assessments that. measures skills and knowledge for a particular job. And a guy that I've worked with for 40 years, he's been training in the material handling world forever. And we're creating a bit of a strategic partnership back and forth because he serves as different industries than we do. And he said, well, let me try one of these assessments. And I think I mentioned this to you. He took the product support sales one and he got 80%. He was upset. And I said, well, wait a second. That's pretty damn good. He said, well, some of those questions are a little iffy. You know, they have different answers, you know, trying to fuzz away. I said, OK, give me an example. And he said, well, the one about features of a piece of equipment. Who are the features of a piece of equipment important to? The manufacturer, the dealer, the customer, or none of the above? And he said, of course, that's the customer. I said, no, it isn't. The customer couldn't care less about the feature. It's the benefit he wants. The salesman's the only one that's interested in the feature. He said, oh, that's right. I said, you want to talk about any of the other questions? He said, no, I don't think so. But it's true, isn't it? We end up with perceptions. And we don't know what the expectations should be. How do you measure a manager? Is turnover rate a good one? If that's the case, every service manager in America should have been fired. You know, at the turnover rate they're having, it's disgusting. And you know the answer that comes back?